Watermark at Beverly Hills, the’s license ended on 22 Apr 2026 when the home changed owner. Now licensed to a new operator as Oakmont of Beverly Hills (license 198320630).

See Oakmont of Beverly Hills today

Watermark at Beverly Hills, the

220 N Clark Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Assisted livingNew owner since 22 Apr 2026
0 Google reviews
Monthly costPrice on requestNot published
Clear RatingNot rated yetLicense ended
Safety, 5 years1Type A citation1 with no later visit on record yet10 state visits
Size75residentsMid-size communityLicensed since 2017
No photos yet

Nearby

The closest communities to Watermark at Beverly Hills, the, with the same details as your search.

  1. No photos yet

    Oakmont of Beverly Hills

    Beverly Hills · 0 mi from Watermark at Beverly Hills, the · Assisted living

    Limited record0 Google reviews

    State record not on Clear yet

    Price on requestNot published
  2. No photos yet

    Pinnacles at Burton, the

    Los Angeles · 0.2 mi from Watermark at Beverly Hills, the · Assisted living

    Clear Rating 93 · Excellent5.0 (1) Google

    State record not on Clear yet

    Price on requestNot published
  3. No photos yet

    Pinnacles at Burton, the

    Los Angeles · 0.2 mi from Watermark at Beverly Hills, the · Assisted living

    Clear Rating 89 · Good4.2 (16) Google

    State record not on Clear yet

    Price on requestNot published
See all communities near Beverly Hills →

Care fit Where this comes from“On record” means it appears in state records. “Listed by them” comes from their website. “Not on record” means there’s no record either way, so ask. Care needs come from the senior you added.

Checked against state records and their website

What Watermark at Beverly Hills, the has on record

Nothing on record yet.

Not listed doesn’t mean not offered. It means there’s no record, so ask.

Being on record means the state or Watermark at Beverly Hills, the lists it. It doesn’t mean they’ve accepted your senior or have a room.

Rating & safety How to read thisThese are the state’s own categories. Type A: problems that, if not corrected, put residents’ health, safety or rights at direct and immediate risk. Type B: problems that could become a risk without correction, or record-keeping problems that affect care. Both must be corrected. Complaints the state didn’t confirm are shown but never counted against the community.

Our score, and what state inspectors found

Our score

Not rated yet

We don’t rate communities whose license has ended. The state’s own record is shown with it.

The state record, last 5 years

1Type AType AThe state’s most serious category: problems that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety or personal rights of residents.most serious category1 with no later visit on record yet
2Type BType BThe state’s less serious category: problems that could become an immediate risk without correction, or record-keeping problems that affect care.less serious category1 with no later visit on record yet
1 of 5Complaintsconfirmed by the state

1 Type A citation and 2 Type B citations in five years, from 10 state visits. The state confirmed 1 of 5 complaints.

Type A and B are the state’s categories for what inspectors found at the time.

Visits, newest first

2025

  1. 22 Nov 2025Routine inspectionType A

    1 Type A citation and 1 Type B citation. Including: Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in not having 2 facility staff associated on Guardian which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Correction plan due 24 Nov 2025. No later state visit on record yet.

    Report
  2. 20 Aug 2025ComplaintNot confirmed

    The state didn’t find enough evidence to confirm the complaint.

  3. 17 Apr 2025ComplaintNot confirmed

    The state didn’t find enough evidence to confirm the complaint.

2024

  1. 20 Nov 2024Routine inspectionType B

    1 Type B citation. Based on [(observation) and (interview), the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in facility staff taking more than 10 minutes to clear alarm from signal system which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Correction plan due 3 Dec 2024. Not cited again for this rule at the next state visit (complaint visit, 17 Apr 2025).

    Report

2023

  1. 16 Nov 2023Routine inspection

    No citations.

Location

Where it is, and how far it is from home

220 N Clark Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90211From the state license record.Get directions

Reviews

What families say. Separate from the state’s safety record.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

No Google reviews yet.

Toured or lived here?

Help other families with an honest review. We check every review before it goes live.

No reviews yet.

License

From the state license record

License #
197609311
Type
Residential care for the elderly (RCFE)
Capacity
75 residents
Since
2017
Licensee
Watermark Beverly Hills, LLC; Watermark Rtmt Comm
County
Los Angeles
Status
Closed, Change of Ownership, 22 Apr 2026
See this license on the state’s site

Contact Watermark

Your message goes to Watermark through Clear. Their reply comes to you by email from Clear, and Clear keeps a copy so we can follow up.

Watermark hasn’t claimed its listing yet. We’ll pass your message on by phone and email, and update you within 2 working days.

Suggestions

Add who it’s for, so Watermark can tell you whether they can help.

Next we’ll email you a code to confirm your address. No password, and it creates your free Clear account.

No cost, no obligation.

Get updates about Watermark at Beverly Hills, the

Email updates are coming soon. Until then, Clear always shows the latest state reports on this page.

What Type A and Type B mean

Type A
“Violations of the regulations and the Health and Safety Code that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety or personal rights of those in care.”
Type B
“Violations of the regulations and the Health and Safety Code that, without correction, could become an immediate risk to the health, safety or personal rights of clients, or a record keeping violation that would impact the care of clients and/or protection of their resources, or a violation that would impact those services required to meet clients’ needs.”

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division, Evaluator Manual. Quoted as the state writes them.

Saved

Communities you save appear here

Nothing saved yet

Tap Save on any community to keep it here while you look around. No account needed.

Browse communities

Places that matter

Drive times across Clear are from these places. Up to 3, saved on this device only.

    Times are typical drives without traffic, from OpenStreetMap.

    Sign in or join Clear

    Accounts are coming soon. Everything you add (seniors, saved communities and places) is kept on this device until then.